[lug] DSL question...

[Mr Viggy]

It's got more "hardware" on it than my 56k modem!  :-)

By Cisco, I assume you mean their internal unit?  It seems kind of
funny, all of the docs on Linux ATM DSL seems to state that all the
"modems" just read the raw ATM packets.  If this is the case, I would
assume that the Intel would work just as well as any other (with the
proper drivers, of course).

Viggy

"Timothy C. Klein" wrote:
> 
> I don't think that "modem" will work with Linux.  I haven't actually
> tried to set it up, but I have searched the 'net and found that it seems
> to be a no go.  I don't know for sure, but I think it is a "winmodem"
> type of DSL unit.  I would bet that all the real work is done by the
> host PC, not the modem.  It is very light on hardware, especially
> compared to my Cisco.  As far as I know, Intel hasn't released any specs
> on the device either.
> 
> Sorry,
> 
> Tim
> 
> * Mr Viggy (LittleViggy at alum.manhattan.edu) wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has setup a Linux box to work with an Intel
> > Pro/DSL 2200 internal modem.  I've been playing with mine, and getting
> > nowhere real fast.
> >
> > Viggy
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> --
> ==============================================
> == Timothy Klein || teece at silverklein.net   ==
> == ---------------------------------------- ==
> == "Hello, World" 17 Errors, 31 Warnings... ==
> ==============================================
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature