[lug] Suggested Colo's in Boulder, managed hosting?

Eric Peers eric_peers at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 3 09:02:47 MST 2003


Thanks for the info Bear. I am curious why you said
that Full Hosting/Managed Hosting is superior to
colocation? I've heard a similar opinion from others -
basically because managing DNS and other services is a
pain. Is this why you recommend against full
colocation?

Thanks!
   --eric

--- Bear Giles <bgiles at coyotesong.com> wrote:
> I just put a box in American ISP (amisp.net?) down
> in Lakewood.  2U box
> under $60/month, with 20 or 30 GB/month.  You can
> buy bandwidth by total
> consumption, fixed rate, or burstable rate.  There's
> also 24-hour access
> once I find the rails for my box, for
> $5/person/month more.
> One thing that can't be overemphasized is that
> you're better off with full
> hosting if possible, or at least renting exclusive
> use of a managed box. 
> Full colocation - what I did - only makes sense if
> you are sharing
> administration duties with some friends and have
> very specific needs that
> prevent you sharing a box with others.  (E.g.,
> loading your own Apache
> modules. :-)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List:
> http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667
channel=#colug


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/



More information about the LUG mailing list