[lug] Music manager

[David L. Anselmi]

Daniel Webb wrote:
[...]
> Debian stable definitely isn't bug free, so how does Ubuntu compare in regards
> to stability and bug-riddenness?  If I understand right, they're just doing
> what Debian is doing (starting with unstable, freezing that and working the
> bugs out) but on an accellerated schedule, right?  If so, either they work
> less of the bugs out or they do a better job than Debian, either of which I
> could believe.

I don't think either is true.

- they support less software so they have fewer bugs to start with
- they support fewer architectures and fewer configuration choices so 
their fixes are simpler
- they pay people to work on Ubuntu so the get things done quicker (more 
hours per day spent on the distro)
- they may well have different standards as to what constitutes a 
release critical bug

Dave