[lug] Very odd, not really linux question -- WATT 32, AT&T at home

[Zichary O`Tea]

Yeah, when I do that it has some problems with the nameservers.  My guess
is that AT&T name servers have a non-standard Address resolution protocal,
or Watt32 does.  I guess I could sniff the packets and stuff, and find
out.  Maybe I will, some day.

On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Sean Reifschneider wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:20:53PM -0500, Zichary O`Tea wrote:
> >Although I can set my hostname in wattcp.cfg, it appears that when my host
> >name is sent durning the DHCP DISCOVER process, it appears as a "fully
> 
> Don't use DHCP.  Simply set up the static IP that they gave you on the
> install invoice.  That's what I did...
> 
> Sean
> -- 
>  "Bill and Ted on cryptography: If you are really us...  What number are we
>  thinking of?" -- Sean Reifschneider, 1998
> Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo at tummy.com>
> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>