[lug] windows on windows for linux?
Timothy C. Klein
teece at silverklein.net
Sun Mar 24 14:38:50 MST 2002
* Ed Hill (ed at eh3.com) wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 05:42, Chan Kar Heng wrote:
> > greetings.
> >
> > would anyone know of something that might be equivalent
> > to WOW64 (windows on windows 64) layer for linux?
> > or maybe the approach taken for migration to 64 bit
> > platform for linux?
>
>
> The Linux (and Unix) 32 -=> 64 bit porting procedure is often quite
> easy. Its called a recompile. Honestly. For many user-space codes,
> its *that* simple.
>
> I've developed C/C++ apps (mostly, scientific computing) on 32bit x86
> systems and then recompiled them to run on, for example, 64-bit Alpha-
> Linux, AIX, and Solaris boxen. A recompile was it. No porting, no
> tweaking, nada. As long as your code intelligently handles the size of
> ints/pointers/etc (and there are headers/libs to assist with this) then
> theres no need for a binary compatibility layer. Your source code,
> compiler, and libraries *ARE* the compatibility layer.
>
It also seems that most of the Linux kernel is 32/64 bit clean already
any way, too. Lot of pointers in linux are guaranteed to be 64 bit
pointers even on 32 bit archs. I think libc might also have this
feature ( I *think* that is how they got around the 2GB file size
limit). So I bet it is a very painless transition.
Tim
--
==============================================
== Timothy Klein || teece at silverklein.net ==
== ---------------------------------------- ==
== "Hello, World" 17 Errors, 31 Warnings... ==
==============================================
More information about the LUG
mailing list