Glibc RHSA was Re: [lug] Too long to fix bugs?

[The Matt]

On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:06, The Matt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:39, Ryan Wheaton wrote:
> > But hasn't Fedora only been out for 5 days?  Or were you being 
> > sarcastic?  :-)

Well, I'm thinking the Fedora Security debate might just heat up.  An
RHSA involving glibc can attract more attention than one concerning
Ethereal.  And I'm pretty sure I can't patch FC1 with an RH9 errata
(2.3.2-101 v. -27).

Maybe they were waiting for this to come through before opening the
updates channel?

Matt
-- 
I am a theoretical chemist.  Fear me!
 Matt Thompson -- http://ucsub.colorado.edu/~thompsma/
 440 UCB, Boulder, CO  80309-0440
 JILA A510, 303-492-4662
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20031112/fd7d8e8a/attachment.pgp>