[lug] Help with mutt config for this list

[Paul E Condon]

I may be able to provide a clue. After my first post, I noticee that
the dual addressing happens only when replying to messages that were
addressed to:

lug at lists.lug.boulder.co.us

and not to messages the were addressed to:

lug at lug.boulder.co.us

For mutt, there seems to be something about the first listed
address that triggers a software malfunction. If similar
things are happening with other MUA, it may be a disagreement
about protocols. 

Why do both these addresses seem to work? Why are there two?
Which is the recommended address?

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:10:11PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
> >I use mutt. Until recently, I was able to reply to this list with L 
> >command because
> >I had put the string 'lug' in the 'subscribe' line in .muttrc
> >Now the L command fills in TWO addresses, as in:
> >
> >To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us, BLUG <lug at lists.lug.boulder.co.us>
> >
> >If I forget to edit this line, you people get to read my emails twice.
> >Has anyone else experienced this (with mutt) and figured out how to 
> >correctly
> >configure mutt for this list?
> >
> >Please help
> 
> Yesterday saw a lot of duplicates, and my Thunderbird tried to reply to 
> two addresses also.
> 
> Today it seems to be happy with your message and a "Reply to All" only 
> brought up the To: address... instead of the Reply-To: address... which 
> seems like wrong behaviour from Thunderbird... but... hmmm...
> 
> Thunderbird just got an auto-update too, so too many variables changed 
> here to know what's really happening... sorry.
> 
> Nate
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug

-- 
Paul E Condon           
pecondon at mesanetworks.net