[lug] new install
steve at badcheese.com
steve at badcheese.com
Thu Mar 15 14:33:52 MDT 2007
Yea, needless to say, the gcc compile took like 200M of swap and a full
day to compile. :)
- Steve
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Ken MacFerrin wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:28:35 -0600
> From: Ken MacFerrin <lists at macferrin.com>
> Reply-To: "Boulder (Colorado) Linux Users Group -- General Mailing List"
> <lug at lug.boulder.co.us>
> To: "Boulder (Colorado) Linux Users Group -- General Mailing List"
> <lug at lug.boulder.co.us>
> Subject: Re: [lug] new install
>
>>
>> I've got a 64-Meg 200Mhz Pentium-1 desktop (why do I keep it around?)
>> that's running Gentoo Linux now. It could run X, but I don't run X just
>> because I think that 64M is a little too low to run firefox, but 128M
>> should be fine to do the basic desktop stuff without swapping too much.
>> :) I use my 64M machine mostly to do bittorrent and stuff. I don't
>> care how long it takes and the networking is the same as it is on a
>> beafy machine, so I'm content with it. I *have* installed a full Suse
>> (9.2, I think) distro on my 64M machine once, but was too slow for
>> desktop use.
>
> Alright.. Gentoo is my favorite desktop distro and what I run on my main
> workstation.. but on a 200Mhz/64M system?.. ouch. I'm guessing gcc must
> take about a full day to compile?
> -Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>
EMAIL: (h) steve at badcheese.com WEB: http://badcheese.com/~steve
More information about the LUG
mailing list