[lug] hald question

[Rob Nagler]

Kevin Fenzi writes:
> selinux shouldn't be stopping hald, and if it is I would expect many
> people to be shouting for a fix. ;) 

I agree with this, but my $.02 about hald is...

I'm not convinced servers need hald.  The software which uses the
messagebus and all that stuff seems to be related to starting/stopping
devices, which is not something servers do.  If selinux is stopping
it, it's better, because the less that is running on a server, the
better imiho. :-)

Rob