[lug] good place to park or sell domains?

[Bear Giles]

Wikipedia says that a TRO doesn't always require advanced notice if there's
reason to believe the other party will act to frustrate the court. E.g.,
hiding assets before they can be documented. I guess he could have made a
hypothetical argument that Robert would have sold the domain the moment he
got notice of the court date but that's very inconsistent with Robert's
other statements.

On the other note email can never be proper service because you can't
provide proof that the right person received the message.


On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Crawford Rainwater <
crawford.rainwater at linux-etc.com> wrote:

> ----- Robert Racansky <robert.racansky at gmail.com> wrote: -----
> > >
> > > I'll update the web site with the actual Complaint and Motion later
> > > tonight, after I stop feeling so sick in my stomach. ?Court does
> > > that
> > > to me.
> >
> >
> > The Complaint and Motion that were filed are now available at
> >
> > http://www.jonahhunt.com/home/2012cv110 (scroll down to "February 13,
> > 2012").
> >
> >
>
> (Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer nor anything near such.)
>
> IIRC for a civil summons to be properly and legally served, the plaintiff
> has to have such within 48 business hours of court date by a third party
> (e.g., civil Sheriff officer, legal processor, your next door neighbor).
>  The court must have also received "Notice of Service" which must be
> notarized or similar by the above noted deadline.  Last I checked, email is
> not considered a proper method for servicing a court summons, let alone any
> similar documentation.  I am surprised a 10 year lawyer does not know this
> and pulled such as well.
>
> The prior is from Linux ETC doing collections on those rare occasions
> where I did all of the paper work with our general counsel doing navigation
> as needed.  Collections are under the civil courts as well as TRO's and
> RO's.  The actual verbage is also on the legal PDF forms that can be
> downloaded from most county's web sites if not the state's judicial web
> site.
>
> As a side thought regarding this situation, is this EFF territory yet?
>
> Good luck in any which way though.
>
> --- Crawford
>
> The Linux ETC Company
> 10121 Yates Court
> Westminster, CO 80031 USA
> voice:  +1.303.604.2550
> web:    http://www.linux-etc.com
>
> Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.  Be
> friendly to the environment by saving paper.
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20120215/82de8956/attachment.html>